Why John is (W)right !

Why John is (W)right !

As soon as it was launched, I managed to pick up a copy of Indian Summers, the memoirs of John Wright’s stint as the coach of Team India. I wouldn’t call it the most authoritarian work on Indian cricket, but with the premise being largely personal, it gives us a worm’s-eye view of how cricket is seen by outsiders. It makes good reading for the understanding of how the system functions, the chaos, the politics and the power. Wright reinforces the commonly held belief of a defunct zonal selection system stronger than ever and even as I say, it is time to rid it off – question marks have risen over a few selections for the Champions Trophy, especially one pertaining to Sreesanth.

To be very frank, I read this book as more of a journey than a mere turn of pages – where John tried to remind me about some of the key moments of his tenure, through a lively description of the games, which makes interesting reading. I have myself resorted to some criticism of Wright’s stint, but this book gives an in depth insight into how he had to fight the dark holes of the Indian cricket system and yet delivered. I find it hard to believe that towards the latter part of his time as the Indian coach, he was at the end of some rather unwanted criticism from the media, public and of course the “former players union”.

After reading the work, John Wright has quite aptly listed some problems that need to be sorted out sooner than later if Indian cricket has to make it to the next level. It certainly did not need a book to remind our moneybags about the state of Indian cricket. When John writes about an unknown person (possibly a journalist) from Kolkata calling him to inform his appointment as the Coach of India, it was a shocker – it sounds aghast to see no levels of professionalism from the Board. Second incident involved not giving John a contract. I mean how on earth can you hire, especially a foreigner without giving him a contract to work under? Sounds absurd, but that’s Indian cricket for you. Often, the off-the field wrangles generate more interest than the matches we play in. Oh and yes, the fact that he had to put up with the mega Board elections by doubling up as Manager and coach for one home series shows how dependent the system is on votes and loyalties. What’s worse, it was his first series as coach of the team.

I remember interviewing a former media manager of the Australian team, Jonathan Rose and he made a very valid point when he said “Your cricket team is a mirror image of how your Board is. Cricket Australia believes and practices professionalism thoroughly and so does our team”. Put it in the Indian context and you’ll probably fill a page with question marks. Professionalism does not merely mean install a CEO with strings tied over his head. In the Indian context, it seems hard to define. It may not also mean having a website. It could probably refer to building a conducive environment where everyone is taken care of – the players, the administrators, the fans, the officials. Cricket Australia practices this to the T. How shocking is it to know that common fans like you and me form just 10% of a ticket sales during a one-day international in India ? Ask where the rest of the money goes, and the answer is “loyalists, police commissioners, big politicians” etc ! Oh, have you heard of truck owners being managers of a cricket team ? Probably yes! John Wright mentions about a Maharashtra heavyweight, who became manager of the team, but by profession was a truck owner ! Why don’t we get it ? We need a full-time manager, someone in the mould of a Michael Tissera from Sri Lanka, Steve Bernard from Australia or even Goolam Rajah of South Africa. These guys have been around for ages ! Wright sees it as an award for the loyalty shown by the association towards the powerhouse, which to a large extent is true and unfortunate. I may draw some flak from the BCCI for this, but both me and John Wright know that we are correct.

How about opening another can of worms ? The selection system ! Mention it and you get thoughts like “Arghhh…they did it again !”. Here too, Wright makes valid points worth notice. He says that selectors discuss about who not to select for hours together rather than who to select. The North-South divide often makes more talking than Team India ! The Zonal system was, is and will always be prone to bias, especially with the reputation of the association at stake. But is this the way we select champion teams ? The answer is a loud NO. The pressure on these selectors, often middlemen, is absolutely inevitable. For example, if Kiran More was asked a question on dropping Sreesanth, he’d probably give the same boring answer saying “He is certainly in our minds for the future. We have decided to rest him”. Its time the Indian public gets tired of this shutout and there is a need by the media to create public opinion about the professionalization of the selection system. This has been the demand ever since eternity though. But who wants to lose out on votes ? If their player does well, it means approval from the association and hence a big fat job in the Board. Who says it’s a tough job ? John Wright doesn’t !

Oh ! And who can forget the brigade of former cricketers. This seems like an obsession all over the world, but the brigade is much much stronger in India and the subcontinental countries. They become best friends when the team is succeeding and turn their backs on you when things go haywire. How can you function in such a system ? Some of these guys have coached the team before and hence try and suggest things and maybe boost their candidature, but unfortunately they cant ! its more of an ego problem than anything else. Some of the fiercest critics of Greg Chappell now have been these television experts and its so absurd seeing them change weather from the last six months, when the team has turned out leaner than before. If they knew what to do with the team, why don’t they make good coaches ? It becomes so easy to say “Sehwag should have batted like this, played a shot like that” but did they do it during their tenure ? No ! And yes, seeing a foreign coach as a white-skinned-man who has come to make India his own and some of these experts bringing the strong jingoistic claims of a need for an Indian coach is often seen. I do not know if these airwaves will stop sometime, but that’s the problem in a democracy – you often get away with whatever you say ! I mean how could you condone Sanjay Jha’s public outcry of Chappell last October by calling him a “Godzilla” ? Atrocious, I say !

John Wright may have not given us the results we desired or expected from him, but has certainly shown us the way forward. I used to call him the “Naïve New Zealander”, who believed in going about the job in his own way, his own pace, but this book brings a no-holds-barred approach from the man, which should be lauded. It’s a must read for fans, who look at cricket beyond the 11 demi-gods and are willing to know the harsh realities of the system here. This is not advertising of any sort, but a genuine recommendation from a critic of Wright himself. Its time this book finds a place in the library of every cricket association and the bookshelf of every Board member. That’s the only way Indian cricket can quite “literally” move forward !

Extraaa Nonsense : Where Cricket Weds Crap

Extraaa Innings is back on air ! This seems to be the nth time I am making this statement, but all thanks to Sony Entertainment Televisions's ridiculous policy, it wont stop until the 2007 World Cup is over - thats an assurance ! The only difference this time is that the crap has got crappier and Mandira and Charu have become too inane to switch on the TV sets. Its time cricket gets rid of these elements who seek gracious time to punch their visibility and seek roles. I mean, let cricketers analyse the game not some airhead chicks who did not know what cricket was unless they were offered a ransom by the television channel. Oh, and what on earth is someone like Rohit Roy doing there ? I tend to think he's an absolute disaster at whatever he does (refer Nach Baliye last year) and his constant concern at Dada's exclusion from the team just adds a bit of murkiness about the whole guy.

Now lets get to the show. There is this audacious tarot card reader, who always seems to get it wrong. This was the same lady who predicted India's win in the World Cup of 2003, and the rest is recorded history. Alright, they have the astrologer there, but what dominates the conversations is questions like "Will Mandira have a good Bollywood future ?" ! Holy heavens, are we watching a cricket preview show or weird attempt at trivializing the game ? Absolute rubbish ! Oh and the Maruti ride with Mandira and Charu, seems quite misplaced. Such visuals at best are condemnable, one feels ! How can the Indian audience, the so-called intellectual audience which knows to measure trash and sense accept such a comical approach to cricket ? Shocking!

What is even more unnerving is the India element. I mean, the high emotional ground these anchors gain when they chant the word "I-n-d-i-a", which to a large extent, pisses me off ! It gets too emotionally wound up, that a semblance of objectivity is almost cancelled at the first go, which is absolutely unfortunate. Compare this with a Channel 9 or an ESPN-Star Presentation and you'd probably know how inanely designed show this is. No doubt there is some element of patriotism in these shows, but where Extraaa Innings distinguishes itself is through the use of absolutely unrequired "in-studio jingoism". That brings me into questioning the use of female anchors for cricket. Sexist, as it may sound to readers, I do not feel the need for oomph in cricket and especially when these so-called anchors read through a whole chunk of Cricinfo updates all through the night and come up with questions that sound rather stupid. Oh, no doubt it is one more shot at bagging a Bollywood role for all you and I care (and it sounds better than casting couches too). Mandira's use as an ad-doll also seems rather stupid. All she does is lend her squeaky voice to some of the ads that sponsor segments. I bet, she might have come up with 50 "brought to you bys" in one episode. Her cleavage or whatever she seems to wear attracts more attention than what she tends to talk - such is the low sinking nature of cricket presentation these days. I am sure the Harshas and the Wilkins' must be tearing their hairs apart (if any).

Charu Sharma, who started off as a promising presenter has also a huge part of the blame to share. He was perhaps seen earlier as a man who could restore some sense into the proceedings, but as it has progressed from time to time, Charu has fallen into the trap of bringing in these emotional rants about India and more or less wraps his thoughts with a degree of plasticity. Even in his show the Fourth Umpire, he morphed his thoughts with some elements of extreme patriotism, which exposed his credibility to analyse matches as an expert. Its getting to a stage where, the viewer can almost predict the script given to him, which makes it dull ! Beating around the bush is his forte, he talks too much about things that are absolutely inconsequential to the match and he whatever he talks makes sense only to him ! I mean who gives a f*** if he spent his childhood days in Rajasthan or Sikkim, as it does not justify a good cricket match. He's just nailed himself on the presenter front. As someone who was seen as a decent competition to Harsha, Charu has just taken five steps back ! If he has to get any closer to Harsha, he better get out of shows like Extraaa Innings and the Fourth Umpire. The only time I found him to make sense was during the couple of tennis tournaments he did for Star Sports and Ten Sports respectively. Though, that jingoistic element didnt get off him, especially when he made repeated remarks about Sania Mirza, he sounded effective if not pleasing.

Its time cricket presenting takes a serious step forward. We do not need ladies who just make appearances to attract the cricket-watching male or twist their libidos during a cricket match. All we need is a host of good analysts, who take the viewer beyond the happenings of the game and put in real perspective in whatever they are talking. Bias is as inevitable as Mandira showing off her cleavage, but if these hosts can keep the bias away in their homes, it will make cricket watching a good experience. We need to learn from other countries with this regard too. Cricket presentation is serious stuff. Cricket itself is entertainment, but more importantly its a sport. If we are equating cricket to entertainment in the real sense, we are wrong. Cricket is more unpredictable than what could happen in a prime time daily soap. It can never wed entertainment. But, as Extraaa Innings has proved over the few years its been on air, cricket is made to wed crap and crap of the highest order !

Statutory Warning : Please switch off your television sets from 12:30 pm to 2:30 pm to avoid this show. Ignorance of this warning could lead to a mental disorder that would take years to get out of !

All Opened Up !

Yes folks, the Champions Trophy is up and running. Despite the certain reservations I have had about the intentions behind the tournament, it is slowly moving towards a climax that would rather seem unpredictable. With 8 teams vying for glory in this tournament, it now seems very difficult to pick a definite winner ! Some of the results that the tournament has witnessed has surely justified the nature of one-day cricket, which is now "On-the-Day" cricket. Australia succumbed meekly to some intensified West Indian pressure, while Abdul Razzaq's gusto finish made all the difference between a bigger setback and a victory for Pakistan. Pundits have gone through the various permutations and combinations to see who goes through from their respective groups. It will be a case of luck, on-the-day performance and calculations that will take four of the 8 teams through.

More on Champions Trophy to follow...

Voila...ICC Champions Trophy 2006 Beckons !!

Finally, the drought of a big tournament has ended ! After spending 10 years in wilderness, it is now India's turn to play host for the 5th edition of the Champion's Trophy. It is indeed ironical that the country which mooted this concept in the first place gets its due after the tournament has managed to create a niche for itself. When it started off, perhaps the intentions of the ICC were sounding straight and clear - to create a common platform for all teams and use this to catalyse their future. But now after 8 years, things have taken a 360-degree turn and its more of the commerce that rules the roost and not competition. Its not been a smooth ride after all, considering the marketing and endorsement chaos of 2002. Perhaps, those were the first signals of a long and well-planned commercial venture the ICC invested into four years back then. It may not completely turn into a farcical event just yet, but faces a pretty bleak future in the days and years to come, especially with the invasion of 20/20 being a good money-spinner for the Boards and the ICC.

As far as preparations are concerned, India has been on the dot, since the very day the clearances by the Government and subsequently the tournament was announced. But what should seem murky, is the law that the ICC has chartered, which does not allow "sponsored" stadiums to host any ICC-oriented matches. Which is why quality stadiums like the Chinnasawamy Stadium and the Chepauk have felt the ditch this time. Having said that, it does give an opportunity to other good stadiums in the country to prop up their standards and create an international feel about them. With Mohali being voted as the best stadium in the sub-continent and listed as one of the four centres for the Champion's Trophy, expectations will surely reach the limit, and it is about time Indian stadiums realize the need for recognition, especially in spectator management and hardcore infrastructure. It will give an opportunity for these stadiums to be rated and know where they stand on the international radar. Another positive to come out is the revival of the Brabourne Stadium at the Cricket Club of India, Mumbai. It has been 11 years since the last game was played there and a place that used to be regarded as the Lords of Asia, will soon bear the new look, with bucket-seats and floodlights simmering over the action ! Perhaps an indication of how tradition can merge itself with the needs of change, especially in the new age.

One of the major grudges that foreign teams have when they come to India is the business of traveling. To some extent, their grievances have been looked into by the BCCI and the ICC while the selection of the venues. The tournament will bear a more Western look as teams will shuttle between Ahmedabad, Mohali, Jaipur and Mumbai, cutting across four states that figure in an almost straight line on the political map of the country. So lesser connecting flights, more time in the nets and more action is all that this edition promises. To be on the franker side, I perceive this tournament to be a rough one for teams that are traditional strugglers in the sub-continent. Mainly because the wickets during this part of the year in India will probably assist slower bowlers as the season has not yet got underway and with constant rain in places like Mumbai, the curators may have just compromised a tiny bit on the nature of the pitches. It should be a traditional sub-continental pancaked belter, but also expect some sharp turn and tennis ball bounce if you are a non-Asian team.

Evaluating it critically, one of the main problems of this tournament is the lack of focus of some teams when they especially play this tournament. Australia have mentally resigned themselves to playing the Champion's Trophy to avoid huge sanctions and the signals coming from their side is very clear. The Ashes forms about 95% priority in their minds today - which clearly is a reflection of their mindset about the tournament per-se. England have named an experimental squad for this series, ensuring that their key players will be rested before the Ashes. Which is exactly why I said earlier, that this tournament is losing its competitive value and teams are participating in it just to get a share of the ICC revenue pie and be happy. Not that this tournament has proven to be a great platform per-se for teams going into major series etc. West Indies won the last edition, with a great amount of luck one would feel, but they have failed miserably to kick on from then. New Zealand (2000) is perhaps the only team that considers this trophy a holy one, because of its failure to win major tournaments and the same would hold true for South Africa in the inaugural version in 1998.

Add to that the inappropriate timing of the event - when most teams have just begun their seasonal cricket, barring England. I would not be surprised one bit if certain teams fail to fire as they normally would and expose the rust they have acquired by not playing enough of match-oriented cricket. This turns into a positive for some others who would capitalize on these matches as practice games for bigger tournaments in the future - especially considering high-intensity series like the Ashes. Do not be surprised if Australia get rated as the favourites, but get knocked out of the group stages or the Semis, they have a larger task on hand at home ! And remember, big teams win bigger trophies - a reason why Australia in the Champion's Trophy have regularly suffered in at the hands of teams they would otherwise decimate.

All in all, this tournament promises to be an entertainer, with the likes of Mandira Bedi always "charming" the screen and the likes of Kapil Dev stuttering some straw-hat English. With the marketers of the tournament doing a good job, especially with the advertising, it is of no doubt that cricket turns entertainer for a month. The format seems to be a bit skewed, but it only adds to the drama and the anxiety of cricket lovers. On a personal note, I back the form teams, two from the sub-continent to make the Semi-Finals, whereas the other teams may just struggle to tie two ends together here, partly due to focus and largely due to the conditions. For India, its a big tournament - one that can provide their World Cup charge some impetus, a direction, which will reinforce the faith and the belief that many of us have laid on our team. But, from the 8 teams in the race, may the best horse win !