Of rattled responses...

Of rattled responses…

Timeline of events :

August 20, 2007 : The “rebel” Indian Cricket League announces the signing of 44 Indian domestic players and six foreign cricketers from Pakistan and South Africa. On the very day, Abdul Razzaq, the Pakistani all-rounder announces his retirement from international cricket, in protest of his omission from the twenty20 World Cup squad. Several young talented cricketers, who represented India at various age-group levels join the ICL in possibly lure of money and an opportunity, risking their India future.

August 21, 2007 : The Board for Control for Cricket in India, reacts in its typical knee-jerk fashion announcing an increase in the per-day fee for players participating in its domestic tournaments. The prize money for winning teams increases almost 7 times. But, having lost what Kapil Dev claimed to be the “cream of the country” to the ICL, this was nothing but on expected lines. Also, the Pakistan Cricket Board follows its neighbour in stating that players who leave their shores to play in the ICL will face a life-ban. The BCCI, sticking to its diktat, sacks Kapil Dev as the Chairman of the National Cricket Academy. And Erapalli Prasanna’s role as Spin Coach with the Karnataka State Cricket Association comes to an end. Since India’s best off-spinner defected to the ICL as a Board member, this again was not a new development.

August 22, 2007 : The ICL makes claims of trying to rope in John Buchanan as the chief coach in the camp to be conducted for its recruits at this resort called Mayajaal in the outskirts of Chennai. The camp is expected to begin from August 29.

August 23, 2007 : The say of intense drama, to say the least, as both parties share the limelight, the BCCI a tad more. In a dramatic development, the BCCI announces its response to the ICL by launching the “PROFESSIONAL CRICKET LEAGUE” – based on the ICL format one presumes. According to a television channel based in Mumbai, Lalit Modi, the BCCI’s vice-president was scheduled to meet the IMG (International Management Group), a sports-event management company that organizes the famous Tata Open, apart from others in India. The discussions with the IMG would revolve around the format of the event. The television channel also claimed that the tournament will involve a mix of domestic and international cricketers. The TV rights would be awarded to aspirants through a bidding process and money being central to the event itself, every team would have a sponsor who would be contracted for five years. And the biggest bombshell dropped by that channel was a subber carrying “Its official. It is Gavaskar versus Kapil”, probably because Sunil Gavaskar is likely to head the PCL or whatever. How credible is that, one doesn’t know? I somehow agree with a television commentator who made a valid point about the manner in which the BCCI is reacting to this whole ICL as lending it more credibility than it probably should have got.

On the other hand, the ICL perhaps won the mind-games today to an extent when Bengal’s Sports Minister came out in support of the rebel league and made a statement allowing the organization to use the Eden Gardens to stage their games. Subhas Chakraborty, the minister in question, spoke to NDTV, a television news channel in India and said, "Whatever facilities we have, we will make available to the boys who have been punished, particularly by the Cricket Association of Bengal (CAB).” (Source: Cricinfo) Chakraborty, if one can recall was supposed to contest the CAB presidential elections last year, but his comrades intervened and was asked to pull out, and eventually the current CAB President Prasun Mukherjee won the race. And the premise may seem a bit anti-Sharad Pawar, as Subhas is known to be a strict Dalmiya loyalist.

What these responses and muddling have done is to bare the BCCI’s inability to handle situations of crisis. For all we knew about Sharad Pawar’s statement in his typical, “ICL is only veteran cricket. People will not come to see them play”, the ICL have reacted and threatened to deprive Indian cricket of some really talented cricketers. And this ego-battle is likely to continue, having taken note of how the BCCI has reacted to this new commercial venture.

Why does the BCCI have time and space for these sort of ventures that hardly cater to the development of cricket in this country ? I mean, if they stood by their cause, they better stick to it ! How many promises did Sharad Pawar come to the helm with sometime late 2005 ? How many have been fulfilled ? Where is the CEO? Where is the professional system that he and his team were about to bring? Or may be he has done it, by including the word “Professional” in his new attempt to capsize the ICL. For now, it wont be wrong to say as my professor in college would, “You are heading for a major disaster in life, font 18, bold and underlined.”

Go and ask the people on the streets and they’d say, “Boss, I don’t care. As long as Indian cricket is not moving forward with these steps, I just don’t bother”. Are these public mudslingings taking Indian cricket forward ? Is this Professional Cricket League or whatever they call it going to make India the number one in International cricket ? Why is there a drastic interest in twenty20 cricket in a country that called it names at the first place ? Is this the beginning of the end of Indian cricket ? I don’t know. But as far as I am concerned, apathy is what I am beginning to develop towards the game in this country.

The Follow-on tirade

The Follow-on tirade

A lot has been made of Rahul Dravid’s decision to not enforce the follow-on in the England second innings of the Oval test. The media, the former players’ union and the public at large have come out with their judgement on the “What should have been ?” and the “What could have been” of Dravid’s decision of batting on. To me, all these rants and raves look retrospective. The popular mindset, including mine and the others who couch along and stare the television felt that India should have enforced the follow-on, but rightly so, the public does not run the eleven on the field. And similarly, the former players have had their days at leading the team, and now, critiquing the current lot seems a very good occupation, sigh !

I had a very fierce argument with one of my relatives the other day about this decision. I was of the opinion that Dravid should have stuck England in on the fourth day morning, as I felt that “the pressures of playing in a follow-on situation are something different by themselves” and 319 runs were indeed daunting. He brought out his experience of watching the game for over three decades and in defence of Dravid said, “Boss, he did it right, he had to secure the series first.” After that is done, I ask myself, what looks prettier when my grandchildren revisit this tour, a 1-0 win or something bigger, by which I mean a 2-0 win. Of course, there are pros and cons to everything one does and says. And I do back my belief that Leeds and Kolkata do not happen every now and then.

Was it defensive captaincy or smart captaincy ? The answer to this question might be as complicated as the context itself. As usual, there was a slight tinge of complacency that had crept into the team by the time Monty was given out. It didn’t need a nuclear scientist (the rocket has taken off) to make out that the bowlers were lacking the intensity upfront. Their deeds smelt of the “chalta hai yaar, we have to just bat for a while” attitude. Now, that was wrong. A stroll in the park was all they thought and set-out with, but it turned out to be a planless effort. If the Indians were petrified with the thought of Michael Vaughan and his team putting 450 runs on the board on a fourth and fifth day wicket, Jerry would be laughing. Yes, knowing that we Indians do not chase down totals that seem innocuous (go back to Barbados 1997, when India crumbled with 120 to get or for that matter Chennai 2001, when India huffed and puffed with a target just over 150 against the Aussies), Dravid might have decided to take the other route.

Today, some section of the press came out with this rhetoric about Zaheer Khan making a statement saying, “I was not tired.” And one of the lesser-watched English news channels started tinkering with a possibility of Zaheer being a divisive force in the team. Questions like “Is he going to play the ODIs” propped up. An act of shameful seduction by the Press Trust of India, and with the Indian players so pathetically poor in media relations, they give out such ambiguous answers that become subject to personal and material interpretation. Obviously, they might have asked stupid questions like, “Did Rahul inform you ahead of taking the decision ?”, or more likely, “Zaheer, were you tired ?”, to which Zaheer would have said “No.” After all, he cant make himself sound stupid by saying, “Oh. Yes, I was tired after bowling X number of overs.” If that were the answer, question marks over his fitness would have just popped out of nowhere. This whole incident is nothing short of being dramatised and cashed in upon.

Utter non-sense I say. A man who ended up with 18 wickets is the matter of discussion in a totally non-existent context. Zaheer’s statement was perhaps misconstrued, misinterpreted and played with accordingly to suit the press’ needs. There was no damning need to make this a major issue.

It is so easy to sit and comment. I made the blunder of vehemently putting forth my point, but I think I justified it with facts, history and situations, unlike the media, which is just going hammer and tongs about something that “never should have been” under the scanner. Now you have one answer to the question posed right upfront. In the meanwhile, the tirade just continues...

Bikini Cricket : Not so skinny after-all

Bikini Cricket : Not so skinny after-all

Twenty20 cricket is coming of age, most certainly. After four years of realizing the phenomenon, a game that started off as twenty overs of slam-bam-whack-shack cricket is increasingly becoming a tactician’s trial and a captain’s test. It still reminds the boys or the men to cling on to the cliché of “stick to the basics”, but there is a lot beyond just that. Four years of constant experiments and investment has indeed paid off, so much so that teams are opting to be the meticulous over the callous.

People often say that it is a different ball game altogether, and twenty20 certainly is. The rules are pretty much post-modern that mostly seem daunting to the bowlers and perhaps tempting if you are batter. But what gets lost in all of this is the method. After generating enough curiousity and achieving its material objective, twenty20 is becoming a thinker’s game, more than any branch of cricketers. Yes, the rules are slightly different and rightly so, after all this is Bikini cricket. A front-foot no-ball costing two runs makes the bowler think more than twice before planting his giant strides forward as a free-hit beckons, where the batsman can be out only one way – run-out. The boundaries are brought in, so that the runs are in the game and angles start playing a big part in field-setting. Instead of the usual banter about this game being a batsman’s business more than a bowler’s toil, twenty20 takes care of every dimension.

The big twenty20 finals day in England was a much needed lesson to people playing this game or even the captains of the various teams heading to South Africa. There are finer trade secrets, which were revealed by some of the English players, most notably Jeremy Snape who won this championship twice with the Leicestershire Foxes in 2004 and 2006. One of the more fascinating findings was the role of a dugout in the innings. As you know, twenty20 has taken to this footballesque concept of a dugout or a bench, where a few of the team members are seated, along with the coach. As Geraint Jones walked out to bat for Kent against Sussex, Jeremy quite rightly said, “If someone is in the dugout, he is not just there to sit and watch the batsmen play. The dugout is all about warming up – getting used to the atmosphere, knowing where exactly the runs may come from and which bowlers to line-up. You start playing your innings from the dugout. Plan it there and execute it in the middle.” These were quite startling at first glance, but as one got more into the game they seem more practical than just mere commentary points.

The other important component of a successful twenty20 line-up is the spinner. A dying art, the purists might claim, is indeed coming to life in this version. While following twenty20 cricket, right through its inception to what it is today, the spinner has had plenty to say as far as the direction of the game is concerned. They could either become a target of slaughter for the batsmen or may dictate the pace in which the game goes. The theory doing the rounds at the moment in England is, “slower the bowler, slower the pace of the game”. In a twenty over match, it is so easy for the players to get carried away by the quick pace of the game, and this is where the spinner comes and slows things down to a large extent. Martyn Ball, who recently retired from First-Class cricket, was a master at this during his twenty20 days with Gloucestershire. Nayan Doshi, the son of former Indian spinner Dilip Doshi, played a very crucial part in Surrey’s making of a very good twenty20 side. The left-arm spinner is the leading twenty20 wicket taker in England with 53 scalps in, and would have been a sure fit in any international team designed for this version. India might have missed a trick or two at not even considering him, or even England for that matter. Graeme Swann of Nottinghamshire is another such example and even Murali Kartik, the forgotten spinner in the Indian books, bagged a consolation fiver for his county Middlesex recently. If one had a closer look at the recently concluded twenty20 Cup in England, the spinners bowled boldly at the death, showing enough courage to face the onslaught. So, a batsman’s game, says who ?

As a captain, if you thought your plate was full and heavy, think again. The clock ticking over at the bottom-right of the electronic scoreboard indicates the allotted time within which the twenty overs have to be bowled. If the last over is not bowled within one minute of the allotted time, the fielding side is automatically handed a penalty of six runs to be added to the batting team’s total. No monetary cuts, no over-reduction, just six runs that could turn pivotal to a team’s result on that day. Will this ensure a bit more responsibility on the part of the captain to get his overs bowled on time? No one knows. But with the six runs at the back of his mind, it could just trigger a willingness to get the job done and dusted before the clock decides to beep.

One of the basic queries regarding twenty20 cricket is why teams resort to playing specialists. The term “twenty20 specialist” is a slightly inexplicable term, because the general consensus is that if someone can play Test cricket or even one-day cricket, he should be able to adapt himself to twenty20 cricket, which is a justified argument. But, the twenty20 game has seen a lot of evolution, and the players who have been successful in this short version of the game have to put up with tags of specialists. Ian Harvey of Australia, twenty20’s first centurion is by-far the best in the category of specialists and an ideal twenty20 cricketer - someone who opens the batting, has a dash at everything, comes back bowls his four overs with a lot of variation in speeds, mix-ups, lengths. For instance, South Africa does not play Albie Morkel, Johannes Van Der Wath and Roger Telemachus in their preferred one-day team, but they sport the dark-green stripes for the Proteas in the twenty20 competition. England has named a squad for the twenty20 World Championship filled with players who do not play Test or ODIs for them. Luke Wright, Darren Maddy, Jeremy Snape and James Kirtley (who specializes in bowling at the death) are all considered “twenty20 specialists” and rightly so. Though only time will tell how this novel concept of specialists will turn out to be, and it’s first big laboratory is South Africa.

Twenty20 cricket might be entertainment alright, but along with keeping that E-factor in mind, teams must not compromise on the way the game is played – from the dugout, in the mind and on the strategy-board. All this theorizing may sound complex at first reading, but unless teams could learn from characters like Jeremy Snape, theory could just remain that. Yes, at first go, twenty overs sounds a decent run out for the teams, but as the twenty20 game has evolved and progressed, there is just a lot more method to it than the crowds and the cash.

(More to follow, India’s taste of Twenty20 cricket)

Its time for Bikini Cricket

Its time for Bikini Cricket

“Twenty20 [twen-tee twen-tee, twuhn-tee twuhn-tee] – noun, adjective - Noun- a version of cricket introduced in England in 2003, specifically to bring in the English family of mom, dad, kid and dog to the games. Also refers to a version of cricket played between two sides over 20 overs each. Twenty20 cricket is typically characterised by a football style dugout/bench and on-field cricketers wired to the commentary box. Adjective – If its cricket in England, it is Twenty20 (as Sky Sports calls it these days).”

That’s how you’re thick and fat Oxford Unabridged would describe twenty20 cricket. I choose to call it Bikini cricket. Ask me why, and I have a metaphorical answer to it. If limited-overs cricket was known by the colloquial as Pyjama cricket, stripping it a bit more would reveal nothing more than a Bikini. Another analogy could be a common term in Bollywood – the Item Number. Enough of the explanation, time to move on to the core of this game.

As mentioned before, this rather short and cute version of cricket was introduced by the England and Wales Cricket Board in 2003 to bring in the crowds as they felt cricket was a dying sport in the country. More so, because cricket in England was and is believed to be an Elite sport. Involving the masses was critical for cricket in England. The administrated resorted to a game that was designed and packaged to entertain. Four years old today, Twenty20 cricket has hardly looked back since then. In fact, it’s grown beyond expectations. It has managed to do what it set out to – pull in the crowds, with some whack-whack entertainment and emerged a big cash cow for the ECB and other cricket Boards since then. And with the ICC looking in to include Twenty20 as a formal cricketing version and a World Cup to acknowledge its impact, Bikini cricket is here to stay.

After seeing the impact and the interest this carnival generated in England, other countries did their bit to initially experiment and later adopt this product. South Africa, in 2003-04 was the first country outside of the United Kingdom to take up to it and today, twenty20 cricket is considered to be a big hit there. Sri Lanka led the way as far as the sub-continent is concerned with the inaugural edition in 2004. Bangladesh re-launched their much-famed corporate league as their version of twenty20. Pakistan followed suit with the ABN-Amro Cup in 2004, almost converting the cricket field into farms and zoos, with teams named as Lahore Lions, Rawalpindi Rams, Karachi Dolphins, Sialkot Stallions etc. One area where the Pakistani edition scores over other Asian countries is where they ensured that their stars took part in the tournament. I remember watching Inzamam-Ul-Haq taking guard for Multan Bears (aptly named one would suggest) and Shoaib Malik playing for Sialkot Stallions. Australia played their first domestic twenty20 tournament in 2005 with KFC as their main sponsors. Sir Allen Stanford’s vision gave the West Indies a sighter of what Twenty20 cricket really meant to the world. Crowds pouring in, drums back in motion, the atmosphere in the Caribbean were nothing short of a carnival. These teams have in most ways seen the twenty20 as a major area to revive the lack of public interest in domestic cricket.

Whilst other countries associated and affiliated with the ICC gradually started realizing this fantasy into a reality, India, the game’s sleeping-yet-overactive commercial giant­ saw this as a major infringement to their ambitions. Former BCCI Presidents, across factions made statements like “Tomorrow someone will start a 10/10, does it mean we start that too ?” and “Twenty20 is not real cricket.” One might not blame them, as after 75 years of the Board’s existence, they do not have a system that can call itself World Class, beginning with the top of course. And one of the highlights of India’s withdrawal syndrome in this case is that India played its first twenty20 International in South Africa (Johannesburg), even before they staged a domestic twenty20 tournament, which is rather bemusing. To confound this a little further, India won that game, thanks to Dinesh Karthik late heroics. And budge, they did ! To growing pressures within the ICC, where their always-trusted Asian “fraternity” supported the ICC’s Twenty20 vision, leaving India as the loner ! India hosted its first ever Twenty20 domestic tournament in 2007, an absolute shocker by itself. Even though state associations in India have managed to capitalise on the twenty20 waves through the Bradman Cup (played in Bangalore annually and hosted by KSCA and the ANZC) and the DY Patil Invitation 20/20 Cup (played in Navi Mumbai at the DY Patil College Stadium), the Board never took this seriously.

The Indian Board, by their own admission did not have a fantabulous response to the event, especially with the domestic season almost over and most national players just having returned from that infamous World Cup exit. Drooping public interest in the game might have been one of the causes, maybe. But some however, chose to make amends by their participation and eventually, a young Tamil Nadu side led by Dinesh Karthik ran out as worthy winners. And to not have it televised was an acute disaster by itself. The Board could have searched for better excuses than saying, “Our contract with Nimbus only extends to Ranji Trophy matches.” and if one is not mistaken, the deal was struck to promote First Class cricket and not to discriminate between the versions. The reluctance of the Board to tow the global line meant that a women’s twenty20 match between Asia XI and the Africa XI was the first international of the kind to be played on Indian soil.

Internationally too, twenty20 seems to have made its mark. The Asian teams have not really seen the potential of the game, but the Australians, the South Africans, the Kiwis and the English don’t mind a twenty20 international or two wherever they go or whoever visits their land. Again, shorter boundaries, more hits to the fence, and three hours of full-fledged action. The boring jerseys take a break as New Zealand tried putting on their Beige sleeves and sporting the retro moustached look. The Aussies gave their long-spellings a break by trying something different in the Ashes Twenty20 clash last year. Gilchrist got rechristened as Church, Clarke as Pup, Ponting as Punter and so on and so forth. Quite refreshing indeed.

The purists may deem this form of the game as an absolute nonsense and they do have their right to, having seen many an intriguing contest between bat and ball. But, as I mentioned earlier, Twenty20 is here to stay, be a nimble ant and take little baby steps towards giving cricket a modern look. However, I still am of the firm belief that while cricket can be played in Pyjamas, or as I say Bikinis, the Whites and the Baggy caps will and must go nowhere.

(More to follow, on why twenty20 cricket is not as easy as it looks)